Maus

-

I liked Maus more than I thought I would, and while the content is very heavy, it was handled very well.  The style of drawing seemed to fit very well for the story told. I felt that Spiegelman’s decision to tell the tale with animals was very important to the way the piece ended up. With such a heavy subject, taking away the visual humanity seemed to make it more approachable and I think this is why it was received by teachers and students so well. Yet, the way he handled it made sure not to take away any of the humanity from the story itself, a very carful balancing act that I do not think many people would be able to pull off. The use of mice, cats, and pig was a great streamliner visually because the reader could instantly understand who was who, as opposed to the author having to introduce that information. I think that part of the reason this graphic novel was able to make such an impact was the way the author was able to communicate relations ships. Whether they were long term like his father and step mother or short term like his parents and the various people who helped to hide them, each felt genuine and real. The visuals and text worked extremely well together and were able to support each other. One of the characters that I connected the most was Mala. Her and Vladek ‘s relationship seemed to evoke a lot of old school relationship elements that I felt I was exposed to to an extent while growing up. Ideas such as the man leading the household, the wife taking the coats at the door and catering to the guest, etc. this in turn made me feel sympathy for Mala because of how Vladek treated her. The stress revolving around the topic of money that was illustrated through out their relationship also connected with me, because of similar things I have experienced. It felt very truthful in the way it was handled. Spiegelman was also very good at the pacing of his story, and the break between past and present was handled very well. I especially like how he addressed the passage of time in the present, and not just having the whole thing told at one sitting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

-
    Frankenstein A very common story in present day, this book caused quite a stir when published. Along with the outcry concerning its topics and imagery was also the question of its genre. Largely placed in gothic literate now (indeed much of Shelly’s inspiration was from highly regarded gothic authors of the era), there were other authors who thought otherwise, such as William Beckford (author of Vathek ). Mary Shelly’s novel produced a great disgust in the man which resulted in a scathing review, partly due to the highly descriptive nature of her writing. It was much more graphic than the gothic sources of that time. However, it now seems that this specific element know plays a part in the gothic requirements. The key part of gothic literature is the sensation that its words can create. Before engulfing myself into this novel I had not realized the extent that an authors life can effect their writing. It seems a rather obvious notion now, but previously I had
Read more

Interpretations of une semaine de bonte by Max Ernst (in class)

-
What appears to be a body in the background, I interpret as the woman’s husband who has fallen down the stairs and has died, at which the rooster laughs at the widow’s misfortune. The rooster seems to be a continuing death symbol; this time it is displayed preparing a woman’s body for burial. The burial is preformed by roosters while another woman undresses. Roosters tend to an object while one woman resides on an alter, while another has been slated for death (poison crossbones are visible). Victorious, a murderer celebrates his kill (possibly a spouse?). Roosters are again present in the subject of death. A rooster controls the movements of a woman in black, whom is either; possessed, doomed, or marked for death. A possible meaning of death controls us?
Read more

Underground Comics/ Tits and Clits, Mr. Natural

-
This week was a very interesting one because I had not had any previous experience with the content of underground comics. I was surprised to find that I enjoyed parts of the Tits and Clits comics. Over all this one felt different from the other samples, almost tamer in a way. While still very explicit, the content behind the explicitness was less predatory, making it a more comfortable read. I also liked how there was a Varity of styles included in the issues, each with their own way of pushing their drawing styles to extremes. The stories felt like they were written to relate to woman, and often seemed to have more emotionally centered segments where we the reader are inside of the character’s head. Other underground comics seemed to be more centered on shock value, slapstick, and confrontations between characters and opposed to these more interment moments. Looking through some of Robert Crumb’s Mr. Natural , I felt disgusted. Much of the explicitness was dirti
Read more