Comic Strip/ Little Nemo, Calvin and Hobbs, Peanuts

-

I really enjoyed Winsor McCay’s Little Nemo because of its use of fantastical imagery and color. Seeing the class examples in the original size and format was also really cool, and I could really see how well Winsor made use of the space with details, negative space, and number/shape of panels. I also noticed how he uses patterns to help excite and lead the eye. Often there will be a costume or environmental element that persists through the whole page, giving a common element to the reader to follow. Some of these are dots against black, thick stripes, or even creature such as a lion or elephant. The use of these animals as fantastical also dates the piece because of how differently it would have affected readers. Now days these animals are much more common place thanks to the internet, film, and zoos. Most people have seen them, where as earlier unless one lived in a city with a zoo the only other opportunity would have been a traveling circus. The panel lay out also felt very unique compared to other strips, and I can now recognize how he has influenced other artist because of this element. An example that comes to mind are the dream sequences of Calvin in Calvin and Hobbes, commonly space themed with aliens. The Saturday issues of Watterson’s comic always had a playful feel to the layout, using different geometry and combinations. I always especially enjoyed when his color palette was very concise, those ones always felt more powerful and calming when I was young. After reading Little Nemo, I could really see the influence it left, and in the bigger picture the trickle down effect that seems to have happened through the life of comic development. Comparing Peanuts to Little Nemo almost feels like comparing apples to oranges because of how different the approaches are. Where Winsor relies more on the use of imagery and wacky drawings to transport a reader, Schultz is more grounded reality and word driven with simple characters and drawings. Physical comedy that is show is typically slapstick, like Lucy pulling the football out from Charlie. Despite these stark differences both strips have their own unique appeal and contributions to comic history.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Underground Comics/ Tits and Clits, Mr. Natural

-
This week was a very interesting one because I had not had any previous experience with the content of underground comics. I was surprised to find that I enjoyed parts of the Tits and Clits comics. Over all this one felt different from the other samples, almost tamer in a way. While still very explicit, the content behind the explicitness was less predatory, making it a more comfortable read. I also liked how there was a Varity of styles included in the issues, each with their own way of pushing their drawing styles to extremes. The stories felt like they were written to relate to woman, and often seemed to have more emotionally centered segments where we the reader are inside of the character’s head. Other underground comics seemed to be more centered on shock value, slapstick, and confrontations between characters and opposed to these more interment moments. Looking through some of Robert Crumb’s Mr. Natural , I felt disgusted. Much of the explicitness was dirti...
Read more
-
The Night Circus i had actually picked up this book earlier but had not found time to read it until this class. the writing style felt very fresh and almost exotic to the tongue. i really loved how Morgenstern crafted her sentences, the linguistic embellishments really helped add to the mystical feel of the novel. i also liked how the author split the narrative between the two characters to display how differently they are raised.    both grow up in a well off way, yet the social aspects of their development are completely different. Celia travels via the backstage, learning from an active performer (her father) and exposed to large crowds.  Marco on the other hand is raised in almost complete isolation with the exception of trips with his teacher.yet despite the vast difference each grows very powerful (weather through books or pain), showing that both methods are indeed effectual.    the author also writes n such a way that the reader feels included, adding...
Read more
-
I Live With You This was a very neat piece of writing because of the point of view it is told from. in fact the writer is careful to make sure we never know quite who is talking to us, whether it is a manifestation of mental making or an actual being. this is what drives the readers curiosity.    i really liked how the author used so many things that we have all experienced to make this secret character come to life. by blaming common place actions on this creation the author keeps the readers attention; we have experienced these things before, is the author going to tell us what has been causing them? things like misplacing objects or tripping over nothing are relateble to the average reader an therefore a safe thing for the author to extort.    while reading i found myself postulating on whether the this being was actually supposed to be within the character. that we all have a sort of split personality where a part of us pushes the other out of its comfort...
Read more