-
The Drowned Giant 1965
This story was an exploration of acceptable action based of relatability. To the persons in this novel, the giant was not one of them and therefore released the townspeople of requirements to treat him as such. To the normal person the idea of exploring a corpse is repulsive, much more so if the body is human. Some ascertain it as a question of morals, others an inset survival trait. Stay away from the thing that’s dead otherwise it could make you dead (disease). This is why the reader (typically) will feel repulsion while reading this story, because the creature is so close to a human, especially in anatomy. The author goes in to great descriptive detail, adding to the gore of the event while at the same time accentuating the unnatural detachment displayed by the people in the story.
   The idea of people (let alone Children) crawling around on a corpse is disturbing at best, but what makes it so is the human aspect of the giant. If it were a beached whale it would be different. Sure, there is still the aversion to crawling about on such a thing, but the idea of letting it rot or scavenging it seems much more acceptable. Having the giant so similar to us beckons beliefs such as respect for the dead. Another aspect of interest is the notable absence of wonder at this event. Everything else about this story speaks for it being the typical world we live in, yet the giant’s appearance only seems mildly interesting.

  While reading the story I was quite surprised about the accuracy and detail of anatomy that the author went into. I felt rather lucky with the timing because in another class we had been exploring anatomy. Having the new information of the other class I felt much abler to visualize all of the aspects the author wrote about the giant. I was quite amazed at the pictures I was able to see in my mind. While reading I also felt sentiment for the main character that we follow. He feels an almost empty type of sorrow as he sees the dilapidation of the giant take place over the coarse of a few weeks. I think that the author was trying to point out how sad it is to loose something truly amazing, to watch something wondrous just melt away from existence. He did this by treating said object as relatively un-amazing to his characters. What is underwhelming to them is quite stunning in the reader’s mind. The point that I am attempting to explain is that the world is constantly loosing things that in another’s eye would seem extraordinary (such as the health of the planet, or an endangered species), yet because of our acustomization we fail to see that way anymore. When we can’t see the amazingness of a thing, we cannot appreciate the implications and depth of loosing it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Underground Comics/ Tits and Clits, Mr. Natural

-
This week was a very interesting one because I had not had any previous experience with the content of underground comics. I was surprised to find that I enjoyed parts of the Tits and Clits comics. Over all this one felt different from the other samples, almost tamer in a way. While still very explicit, the content behind the explicitness was less predatory, making it a more comfortable read. I also liked how there was a Varity of styles included in the issues, each with their own way of pushing their drawing styles to extremes. The stories felt like they were written to relate to woman, and often seemed to have more emotionally centered segments where we the reader are inside of the character’s head. Other underground comics seemed to be more centered on shock value, slapstick, and confrontations between characters and opposed to these more interment moments. Looking through some of Robert Crumb’s Mr. Natural , I felt disgusted. Much of the explicitness was dirti
Read more
-
The Night Circus i had actually picked up this book earlier but had not found time to read it until this class. the writing style felt very fresh and almost exotic to the tongue. i really loved how Morgenstern crafted her sentences, the linguistic embellishments really helped add to the mystical feel of the novel. i also liked how the author split the narrative between the two characters to display how differently they are raised.    both grow up in a well off way, yet the social aspects of their development are completely different. Celia travels via the backstage, learning from an active performer (her father) and exposed to large crowds.  Marco on the other hand is raised in almost complete isolation with the exception of trips with his teacher.yet despite the vast difference each grows very powerful (weather through books or pain), showing that both methods are indeed effectual.    the author also writes n such a way that the reader feels included, adding a new personal level to
Read more
-
I Live With You This was a very neat piece of writing because of the point of view it is told from. in fact the writer is careful to make sure we never know quite who is talking to us, whether it is a manifestation of mental making or an actual being. this is what drives the readers curiosity.    i really liked how the author used so many things that we have all experienced to make this secret character come to life. by blaming common place actions on this creation the author keeps the readers attention; we have experienced these things before, is the author going to tell us what has been causing them? things like misplacing objects or tripping over nothing are relateble to the average reader an therefore a safe thing for the author to extort.    while reading i found myself postulating on whether the this being was actually supposed to be within the character. that we all have a sort of split personality where a part of us pushes the other out of its comfort zone. it is the lady
Read more